FORUM >
CLIPS
> ATTENTION (RANT)
when u make new threads for a clip(s), u dont have to name the thread "new clip" or something along the lines that. WE KNOW ITS A CLIP, ITS IN THE CLIP SECTION! so its harder for me to determine which clips i have or have not seen already unless i open the clip again or read some of the comments left.
please name the thread something that has to do with your clip. not only will it help others sort through the threads, it will stand out from all the other "new clip" threads and more people will watch it.
but u see, im too lazy to click ont he thread, wait for it to load, then if ive seen it go back and find a new thread to check out. it wastes 5 seconds of my precious time
and when you add up everyones 5 seconds, plus the fact that some people will fall for it numerous times (guilty) you probably have a few minutes, hell the number of times ive re-gone into threads ill say youve got a an hour, then when you add up all the different threads pulling this trick. Thats like a few hours, a few hours that could be saved by a 5-10 second thought on how to properly name a thread.
sur you add up all the people that make threads, its still only like 5 seconds to one hour ratio.
this thread brings up issues of classification and effective information retrieval/storage.
Log in to comment
ATTENTION (rant)
halfcab333 00:44 10/Oct/05
when u make new threads for a clip(s), u dont have to name the thread "new clip" or something along the lines that. WE KNOW ITS A CLIP, ITS IN THE CLIP SECTION! so its harder for me to determine which clips i have or have not seen already unless i open the clip again or read some of the comments left.
please name the thread something that has to do with your clip. not only will it help others sort through the threads, it will stand out from all the other "new clip" threads and more people will watch it.
halfcab333 09:29 11/Oct/05
but u see, im too lazy to click ont he thread, wait for it to load, then if ive seen it go back and find a new thread to check out. it wastes 5 seconds of my precious time
TuN$tall 14:58 11/Oct/05
and when you add up everyones 5 seconds, plus the fact that some people will fall for it numerous times (guilty) you probably have a few minutes, hell the number of times ive re-gone into threads ill say youve got a an hour, then when you add up all the different threads pulling this trick. Thats like a few hours, a few hours that could be saved by a 5-10 second thought on how to properly name a thread.
sur you add up all the people that make threads, its still only like 5 seconds to one hour ratio.
ady 22:30 11/Oct/05
this thread brings up issues of classification and effective information retrieval/storage.
Log in to comment